《北京成人教育》第三期朱蓬蓬“企业的短期行为与职工教育”一文和辽宁《职工教育》第二期彭文骥“职工教育短期行为与对策”一文,形成了两种鲜明有别的观点,前者肯定“短期行为”,后者否定“短期行为”.我认为,弄清这个问题,对指导当前职工教育工作健康发展非常重要,这里谈一点我的见解。(一)对“短期行为”函义的理解。有企业的短期行为,必有职工教育的短期行为.当前摆到文面上的“短期行为”定义有两种,一种是依重视不重视职工教育而下的定义,一种是以客观事实和理论为依据所下的定义。本人认为第一种定义法是不甚恰 “Adult Education in Beijing,” the third Zhu Peng Peng “short-term behavior of enterprises and staff education,” one article and Liaoning “Staff Education,” the second Peng Wenji “staff education short-term behavior and Countermeasures,” a text, formed two distinct point of view , The former affirms “short-term behavior” and the latter denies “short-term behavior.” I think it is very important to understand this issue in order to guide the healthy development of the current staff education. Here is my point of view. (A) of the “short-term behavior” understanding of the meaning of the letter. There are short-term behavior of enterprises, there must be short-term behavior of staff education.What is currently placed in the text of the definition of “short-term behavior” there are two, one is attached to the importance of not paying attention to the definition of staff education, one is based on objective facts and Theory as the basis for the definition. I think the first definition of law is not exactly