Conflict style and interdependent orientation

来源 :留学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wulizhu11
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Abstract
  In this article, we suppose that people who are more connected with each other are prefer avoid the conflicts. People who are aggressive are more likely disconnected with others. We make two questionnaires and set one experiment to test 32 people’s strategies while dealing conflicts. In the experiment there are two conditions, one is their roles(recruiter/candidate), one is write down five people who are connected or not. Ac-cording to our data, we foundour data is a little bit confusing, but still, compare to people who will to compromise at some levels, we can see that people who acted more aggres-sive did isolated from crowd.
  Introduction
  As social animal, human live together and also rely on each other. We learn to cooperate, socialize which is not an easy thing to do. Even nowadays, we are still learning. How to communicate with other person, what are they think, why they do that. During the pro-cess of socializing, conflicts happen all the time, different people with various personali-ties all have own ways to solve the problem. Also people always measure their own be-havior after dealing the conflict. We believe that there some relationship between their conflict style, their own evaluation, and result. Our perception is that people who always connect to others more are acting more avoiding during socializing
  In this case of study, we gather 32 high school students, and ask them to answer the con-flict survey first, then test them both the Recruiter case. lastly, they fill the post negotiate perception questionnaire. We analyze their actual final score with conflicts styles and post negotiation perception separately.
  Limitations in this study are two. First, we don’t gather enough people to get involved in the experiment, so the data may not accurate enough. Secondly, during filling the survey, not all of them do it carefully, causing the result directly.
  Literature review
  The article describes self-construal, face work, and conflict styles among cultures in online learning environments. In order to study this they conduct face-to-face or email interviews of participants from six cultural groups. This study addresses the following questions: 1. How do individuals of different cultures reinforce lacework in online envi-ronments? 2. Do the conflict styles of online learners differ among different cultures? 3. Is self-construal related to conflict style in online learning environments?   In this case, they use quantitive research paradigm and emergent design, and the research questions were answered by both face-to-face and online interviews. Researchers ex-pected more participants from more collectivist learning cultures and more individualistic cultures would like to answer in terms of self. However the result of study did not support this expectation. Another result id concern on conflict behavior during online discus-sions . The Anglo Americans had more conflict styles associated with independent self- construal, but they also exhibited behaviors as- societal with interdependent self-construal.
  Method
  In a laboratory study, we ask 32 people who are all high school students from different grades to answer the conflict survey. Ten of them were asked to write down five friends who are disconnected, the rest of them were asked to write down five friends who are connected. Then they have to answer ten questions about what they will do if conflicts happen. After filling the survey, we put 32 people in a case named “New Recruit” and gave them two different roles which are job candidate and job recruiter. In the case, can-didates has to negotiate with recruiters about eight issues of concern(Bonus, job assign-ment, vacation time, starting date, moving expenses coverage, salary, location). Eight is-sues are separately, there are five alternatives for each of the issueswhich has a different degree of importance to then, as indicated by the magnitude of the number of points you could gain or lose. As recruiters, they have to reach an agreement with candidates on all eight concerns mentioned above. The discussion lasted 30 minutes, all them them reach an agreement. We then give them a questionnaire to evaluate their own behavior which is also the last part of our experiment. While analyzing the data, we classify the conflict survey’s result into five categories, which are dominating, integrating, compromising, avoid, accommodation. Our hypothesis is that people who are more connected with each other are prefer avoid the conflicts. People who are aggressive are more likely discon-nected with others.
  Results
  We performed a 1 way anova on just recruiters. the factor was whether they thought about interconnected or connected networks.We looked at their conflict styles, their post-negotiation perceptions, and finally, their actual scores.
  Conflict styles.
  We found a significant effect of avoid (p=.03), that is, when people thought about their interconnected, more likely to avoid others. Potential trend on accommodation as well. more likely to accommodate. These are the more other focused styles of conflict, and this follows predictions. More interconnection, more focused on interconnected others and needs.   No differences on others styles.
  Post negotiation perceptions
  Significant effect where they felt others shared more when they were in interdependent network. p=.01 which follow our hypothesis. Significant effect where they felt they were more competitive when they thought about interdependent network p<.03. Contrary to predictions, we expected more accommodating/avoiding styles in dealing with others.
  Marginal effect on perception of how well they did where people who have connect net-works thought they did somewhat better p<.10.
  Actual scores
  Students were correct in this perception p<.10. Interesting, the effect is that they compet-ed more and claimed more value for themselves. Interdependent prime did NOT cause them to create more joint value for the group asmight be expected to occur when they ha-ve their close relationships in mind.
  楊源梦洁
  年龄:18岁
  城市:四川成都
  就读学校:Norwich Free Academy
  年级:Senior
  未来申请目标专业:教育管理
  本来生活中我们最常接触到的,最需要花时间与精力去经营的就是人际关系。如何与不同的人用不同的交往方式相处?自己在这个过程中又是怎样的表现?你认为的自己和事实上你传达出来的自己是否相同?这些问题让我觉得非常有趣。于是我决定做这个方面的课题。在做研究的过程中,我也遇到一些烦恼,比如数据一直收不齐,数据分析师不会操作软件,结果与预想有较大的差距等。一开始很难接受,但是导师Tanya一直陪着我们,很耐心地指导我们,告诉我们结果与假设存在不同是非常正常的,最后终于有了这篇研究报告。但是我自知这个文章有诸多不足,不够完整不够专业。我希望以后的自己会因为这次经历变得更优秀。
其他文献
930167 Relationship among changes of bloodpicture and hemorrhage to skin,fundus occuliand brain in 220 cases of hematologic disease.WU Bingquan(吴秉权),et al.Bl
对于留学生及其家庭而言,留学安全始终是人们心头之所系。近一年来,中国留学生群体发生了多起安全事件,留学生安全形势不容小觑。有鉴于此,《留学》联合今日头条共同发布留学
2017年1月18日,以“1 N ”为主题的美时教育投资基金成立发布会在北京饭店举行。美时基金由京天投资、民安置地、美世教育集团共同发起成立,这是国内首个由投资基金联手房地产公司与专业教育机构合力发起的教育投资基金。  “产业 资本” 双驱动模式开启  本次发布会主题定为“1 N”,“1”代表美时基金,“N”代表未来美时基金投资的教育行业项目。这既是美时基金在未来教育领域的投资理念,同时也体现了美
2017年3月1日,教育部举行新闻发布会,介绍我国2016年出国留学人员整体情况。据统计,2016年度我国出国留学人员总数为54.45万人,较2012年增长14.49万人,增幅为36.26%。其中国
目的:研究卤化物介导的法呢基砜的简便合成方法。方法:以THF为溶剂,先用卤化试剂NBS和Ph3P对法呢醇进行活化.活性中间体在NaI催化下与苯亚磺酸钠于室温反应6h得法呢基砜。结果:在
粗集料对于沥青路面的宏观构造和微观构造的形成都具有重要作用,其形状、棱角和表面纹理与路面表层的抗滑性关系密切。文章分别采用经过0次、300次和1 000次洛杉矶磨耗的不同
因着良好就业前景的吸引力,近些年选择出国学习计算机专业的中国学生人数在不断增长。本文列述计算机专业实力强盛的全球十大牛校,供大家参考。最近时尚圈和科技圈又有了一次难
目的:减少流引产给弱势患者造成的伤害,保护她们的身体健康。方法:采取随机抽样对2005年6月-2008年6月在山东省枣庄市山亭区妇幼保健院终止妊娠的186例弱势患者进行分析。结果:弱
含银夕卡岩矿床在我国银矿床中占有重要位置,它们主要分布于南岭、长江中下游、华北地台北缘和东南沿海等一些重要褶皱带中,其控矿地层较多,其中以石炭一二叠系最重要。与成矿有