论文部分内容阅读
通过对中国Scientometrics论文和引文做计量分析,用WordSmith Tools软件做主题词分析,并与科学计量学论文高产国印度做比较研究,我们对中国科学计量学的发展有了概略的了解:(1)经过1984—2000年的漫长起步期,中国科学计量学在新千年迅速崛起,已经成为科学计量学论文高产国。(2)在印度,国家研究机构是科学计量学的主要研究力量,而中国的主要研究力量是大学。(3)和印度相比,中国科学计量学论文的高产作者不够高产。(4)引文测度显示,新千年以来中国的科学计量学研究比印度的研究更受国际同行关注。(5)引文研究和期刊研究占中国论文很大份额,研究中国问题的中国论文的比例远大于研究印度问题的印度论文的比例。(6)最近5年中国论文与世界论文高频主题词基本一致,说明中国学者是在国际科学计量学热点领域从事研究的。论文最后给出发展中国科学计量学的几点建议及一个公开讨论的问题。
Through the quantitative analysis of China’s Scientometrics papers and quotations, the thesaurus analysis with WordSmith Tools software and the comparison with the high-yielding country of scientific metrology papers, India, we have a general understanding of the development of science in China: (1) After the long initial period of 1984-2000, China’s rapid development of scientific metrology in the new millennium has become a high-yielding country for scientific metrology papers. (2) In India, the national research institute is the main research force in scientometrics, while the main research force in China is the university. (3) Compared with India, high-yield authors of Chinese scientific metrology papers are not high-yielding. (4) Quotations show that the research on scientometrics of China in China since the new millennium is more concerned than the research of India by international peers. (5) Citation studies and periodical studies make up a large share of Chinese papers. The proportion of Chinese papers on China is far greater than the proportion of Indian papers on Indian issues. (6) The Chinese essay in the recent five years is basically consistent with the high-frequency key words in the world essay, which shows that Chinese scholars are engaged in the research in the hot field of international scientometrics. Finally, the paper gives some suggestions for developing Chinese scientometrics and an open discussion.