论文部分内容阅读
朝鲜儒者对“四端”和“七情”与“理”、“气”的关系问题的哲学论争,简称“四七之辩”。这一论争是整个朝鲜朝(1392年-1910年)时期最为重要的哲学论辩,几乎所有的重要哲学家都直接或间接参与到这一讨论中,反复论难,久乃归一~①。从而规定了朝鲜儒学形而上地把握性情问题的独特思维方式。日据时期的韩国儒学研究的第一人高桥亨(1878-1967)在1929年发表的论文《朝鲜儒学史中主理派和主气派的发达》的序言中说到:“朝鲜儒学者的头脑的70%~80%消耗于四端七情论,朝鲜儒学的相关著述的核心即是四端七情论。”~②对“四七之辩”从哲学与历史为两轴,进行以关键人物为线索的学术回顾是理解朝鲜儒学发展脉络的钥匙,也是窥见韩国儒学之特性的重要通道。
The philosophical controversy over the relationship between the “Four Endpoints” and “Seven Loves” and the relationship between “Qi ” and “Qi ” by the Korean Confucianists, referred to as the “Debate of Four Seven”. This debate was the most important philosophical argument throughout the Joseon Dynasty (1392-1910). Almost all the important philosophers participated directly or indirectly in this discussion. Thus stipulating that North Korea Confucianism possesses a unique way of thinking in its metaphysics of temperament. Takahashi (1878-1967), the first person in Korean Confucianism during the Japanese occupation, said in a preface to a 1929 paper entitled “Development of Domination and Domination in North Korea’s Confucian History:” The North Korean Confucianists 70% ~ 80% of their minds are consumed by the four end emotions, and the core of the relevant writings of North Korea’s Confucianism is the four-end emotions. “~ ② From” philosophy and history " The key to making a clues to key figures is the key to understanding the development of North Korea’s Confucianism and an important channel for glimpsing the characteristics of Korean Confucianism.