我们本打算不再刊发牵涉余氏的文稿,因各方彼此的论点、论据,均已翻不出新的花样。但纯因这篇“分析”风采独异而不忍割舍。一位女性写手,又是关乎如此刚性的论辩话题,竟然将文字调配到这般举重若轻的状态。窃以为,一些呆头呆脑,言语枯涩的须眉文评家学有范文了。 We did not intend to publish the manuscript that involved Yu’s work anymore. All the arguments and arguments put forward by the two sides have failed to find new tricks. But purely because of this “analysis” unique and could not bear to let go. A female writer, once again a topic of debate about such rigidity, even dispatched the text to such an exercise of pawn. Stolen thought, some dazed, speechless wit writer critics have a Pham Van.