论文部分内容阅读
目的比较三种根管糊剂根充术后疗效。方法 146个患牙随机分为三组,二个实验组,一个对照组。实验组1用Cortisomol糊剂加牙胶尖侧压根管充填,实验组2用Vitapex糊剂加牙胶尖侧压根管充填,对照组用氧化锌糊剂加牙胶尖侧压根管充填。术后随诊,时间为1年。结果 Cortisomol组和Vitapex组疗效明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Cortisomol组和Vitapex组疗效差异无统计学意义。结论Cortisomol糊剂和Vitapex糊剂在提高根管充填治疗效果方面明显优于氧化锌丁香油糊剂。
Objective To compare the efficacy of three kinds of root canal paste after root canal filling. Methods 146 teeth were randomly divided into three groups, two experimental groups, one control group. The experimental group 1 was filled with Cortisomol paste plus gypenosides, the experimental group 2 was filled with Vitapex plus gutta-percha canal, and the control group was filled with zinc oxide paste plus gutta-percha canal. Follow-up after surgery, the time was 1 year. Results The curative effect of Cortisomol group and Vitapex group was better than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in curative effect between Cortisomol group and Vitapex group. Conclusions Cortisomol paste and Vitapex paste are significantly superior to zinc oxide lilac paste in improving root canal filling.