杨明明在《俄罗斯文艺》2016年第3期撰文指出,纵观利哈乔夫与古米廖夫的思想体系,两位学者最大的分歧就体现在他们对俄罗斯历史演变进程的认识与文化类型的界定上,但是,这种分歧却不能简单地归结为斯拉夫派与西方派对立的延续。首先,利哈乔夫与古米廖夫都反对彼得大帝改革是俄罗斯历史转折点的观点,所不同的是利哈乔夫认为俄国的转型是14世纪以来历史发展 Yang Ming-ming wrote in Russian Literature and Art, No.3, 2016 that the biggest difference between the two scholars is that their understanding of the evolution of Russia’s history and the definition of the type of culture However, this disagreement can not simply be attributed to the continuity of the Slavic faction with the Western parties. First of all, both Lihachov and Gugumiev oppose Peter the Great’s reform as a turning point in Russia’s history. The difference is that Lihajov believes that the transformation of Russia was a historical development since the 14th century