论文部分内容阅读
本文以人文感悟而不是科学分析的方法,有望把握洪堡特语言研究的总线,揭示语言形式论人文表述的实质,辨析洪堡特所谓语言形式、内在语言形式、外在语言形式和高度完善的语言形式等概念的异同,明确其理论脉络与学术倾向。语言形式和内在语言形式同为精神创造活动而有自为与自觉的区别,两者均对应于外在语言形式——着眼于语音,兼及语音形变跟词义、词汇和语法形式等的关联与类推,以造就高度完善的语言形式。
This article, based on humanistic sentiment rather than scientific analysis, is expected to grasp the bus of Humboldt’s language research, reveal the essence of the humanistic expression of language formalism, and analyze the so-called Humboldt’s so-called language form, internal language form, external language form and highly consummate Linguistic forms and other concepts similarities and differences, clear its theoretical context and academic tendencies. Both the language form and the internal language form have the same self-conscious difference as the spiritual creation activity. Both of them correspond to the external language form - focusing on the relationship between phonetics and phonetic deformation and the forms of meaning, vocabulary and grammar Analogy, to create a highly sophisticated language form.