“禁带酒水”、“最低消费”等情况在餐饮等服务中屡见不鲜,本文从最高法将这类规定认定为“霸王条款”是否合理,是否有其存在的必要性为角度,结合《消费者权益保护法》和《合同法》的相关规定,通过分析,得出对“霸王条款”认定仍需要进一步限制的必要性。 “Forbidden to drink ”, “minimum consumption ” and other cases in the catering and other services are common, this article from the highest law will be such provisions of the provisions of “King terms” is reasonable, whether it is necessary for the existence of Angle, combined with the “Consumer Protection Law” and “Contract Law” of the relevant provisions, through analysis, come to “Overlord Terms ” still need to identify the need for further restrictions.