“任何法律都不能没有牙齿,制度只能以责任为后盾,才具有法律上之力,一切以法律形态实现的目的、宗旨、理念、权 利皆是如此。” 宪法作为一个国家的根本大法也自然不能例外。如果违宪之行为尚能逍遥于法外而无须承担任何法律责任的话,或者即使产生了法律责任却无从追究的话,宪法又何以奢谈其作为根本大法的权威。更有甚者,其作为法的特征也行将受到质疑。在近现代的法治国家中,宪法无疑是最受推崇的“法中之法”,运用宪法打官司也是在法律生活中并不罕见的。只要我们打开网络,我们就可以看到世界上许多国家的最 “No law can not have no teeth, the system can only be backed by responsibility, it has the force of law, all with the purpose of law to achieve the purpose, purpose, philosophy, right so.” Constitution as the fundamental law of a country is also natural No exception. If unconstitutional acts are still able to go beyond the law without any legal responsibility, or even if legal liability arises, it can not be prosecuted. Why should the Constitution talk extraordinarily of its authority as a fundamental law? What is more, its character as a law will also be questioned. In the modern law-governed countries, the constitution is undoubtedly the most admired “law in law”. It is not uncommon for lawsuits to apply the lawsuit in the constitution. As long as we open the web, we can see most of the countries in the world