论文部分内容阅读
2012年新民事诉讼法明确规定了对环境污染的行为,法律规定的机关和有关组织可以向人民法院提起诉讼,即环境民事公益诉讼。由于此类诉讼的特殊性,证明责任的分配问题是影响案件能否胜诉的重要因素。我国现行法律和司法解释并未对此作出明确规定,危险领域说、间接反证说等观点对我国环境民事公益诉讼证明责任分配的构建和完善具有启发意义。
In 2012, the new law of civil procedure clearly stipulates the acts of environmental pollution. The organs and relevant organizations required by law may institute legal proceedings in the people’s courts, ie environmental civil public interest litigation. Due to the particularity of such litigation, the issue of the distribution of burden of proof is an important factor affecting the success of the case. The current laws and judicial interpretations in our country have not stipulated this clearly. The viewpoints in dangerous fields, such as indirect evidence of anti-testimony, are of enlightening significance to the construction and improvement of the distribution of burden of proof for environmental public interest litigation in our country.