论文部分内容阅读
法治不仅具有“力”与“德”的维度,也不能欠缺“知”的维度。西方自然法学无疑在“德”上作出了卓越的理论贡献,而在“知”上却多少存在问题,这被纯粹法学大师凯尔森进行了逐一剖析和批判:对因果与归责的混淆,对超验事物进行理解和把握的不可能性,主观性与相对性,以及使得法学和法律沦为政治附庸的意识形态企图和功能。这些批判,对于反思中国传统和当代法学理论及法律实践都具有重要价值,启示我们在注重法治“德”的维度时,也应当用心于“知”的维度,承担科学认知的重任,以免法治沦为意识形态侵蚀下的一场幻梦。
The rule of law not only has the dimensions of “power” and “morality”, but also can not lack the “knowledge” dimension. Western natural law undoubtedly made outstanding theoretical contributions on “Germany ”, but there are some problems in “knowledge ”, which was analyzed and criticized one by one by pure law guru Kelsen: The confusion of responsibilities, the impossibility, subjectivity and relativity of understanding and grasping transcendental things, and the ideological attempts and functions that make law and law a political appendage. These critiques are of great value to the reflection of both Chinese traditional and contemporary legal theory and legal practice, which suggest that when we pay attention to the dimension of rule of law and morality, we should also pay attention to the dimension of knowledge and take on the scientific cognition The important task is to prevent the rule of law from becoming a dream under the erosion of ideology.