论文部分内容阅读
20年前,在神州大地上展开了一场关于真理标准问题的大讨论。这场讨论是针对“两个凡是”(即“凡是毛主席作出的决策,我们都坚决维护,凡是毛主席的指示,我们都始终不渝地遵循”)提出来的。讨论的焦点是:究竟什么是检验真理的标准?是实践,还是领袖的决策和指示?这不是单纯的学术讨论,要解决的也不只是一个理论是非问题,实际上是两种世界观、两条思想路线、两种指导方针之间的大论战,关系到中国的前途和命运。
Twenty years ago, there was a big discussion on the standard of truth on the Divine Land. This discussion was made in response to the “two generalities” (that is, “all decisions made by Chairman Mao, and we resolutely uphold and always give directions to Chairman Mao, which we all follow”). The focus of the discussion is: What exactly is the criterion for testing truth? Is it practice or leader’s decision-making and instruction? This is not a purely academic discussion. It is not just a theory that is not a question to be solved. It is actually two world outlooks, two The ideological line and the great debate between the two guidelines have a bearing on the future and destiny of China.