史禄国被誉为对中国民族学界“最有影响力的外国人”。然其在中国学界的际遇,以“云南调查事件”为界限,前期礼遇尤佳,此后则受到学界诸多非议,惟傅斯年挺身而出,为之辩护。史氏受到学界非议的原因有二:一是在学术转型时期,彼时中国学者学术视野狭窄,对国际学术新潮的把握严重不足;二是现下学界在研究材料的选择上具有一定的片面性,忽视了史氏作为该事件主角的主体叙事和主体意识的表达,致使整个调查事件中某些重要的事实长期未能被揭示出来。 Shi Lu country known as the Chinese ethnology “the most influential foreigners ”. However, its experience in Chinese academia, “Yunnan incident” as the boundary, the courtesy of pre-treatment is particularly good, since then by the academic community many criticisms, but Fu Sinian to come forward to defend it. There are two reasons why Shi was criticized by academics. First, during the period of academic transformation, Chinese scholars had a scholarly narrow view of academic field and a serious lack of mastery of international academic trendy. Second, there was a certain one-sidedness in the choice of materials for research in the current academic circles. The expression of Shi’s main narrative and subjective consciousness as the protagonist of this event led to the fact that some important facts in the entire investigation incident have not been revealed for a long time.