论文部分内容阅读
我国古代关于盗窃罪的立法有着“计赃论罪”的传统,而这一立法传统在近代经过短暂的断裂后,又在新中国的刑事立法中得以体现。新中国刑法中的“计赃论罪”在内涵上与古代刑法中的“计赃论罪”并不完全相同,主要表现在从定性分析模式到定性+定量分析模式的演变。这种演变,与盗窃行为社会危害性程度的变化、我国传统文化心理以及现实刑事政策密不可分。无论在理论上还是在实践中,纯粹的“计赃论罪”立法模式都已丧失了生存的空间,我国盗窃罪应当确立“双轨制”的立法模式。
The ancient Chinese legislation on theft has a tradition of “accounting for stolen goods,” a tradition that has been embodied in the criminal legislation of the People’s Republic of China after a brief rupture in modern times. In the new Chinese criminal law, the “crime of accounting for stolen goods” is not exactly the same in meaning as the “crime of stolen goods” in ancient criminal law, mainly manifested in the evolution from qualitative analysis to qualitative + quantitative analysis. This evolution is closely linked with changes in the social harmfulness of theft, the traditional cultural psychology of our country and the actual criminal policy. Both in theory and in practice, the purely “legislative approach to counterfeiting” legislation has lost its living space. The crime of theft in China should establish a “dual system” legislative model.