论文部分内容阅读
《教师法》第六章(待遇)第二十五条是这样表述的:“教师的平均工资水平应当不低于或者高于国家公务员的平均工资水平,并逐步提高。建立正常晋级增薪制度,具体办法由国务院规定。”笔者觉得以上的表述明显地存在着不妥的地方。“不低于或者高于”这一短语在人们理解的时候,极易发生误解。因为这是一个歧义短语。读的时候,由于停顿的不同可以有两种不同的理解可能。其一是,“不/低于或者高于”;其二是,“不低于/或者高于”。若是按第一种停顿的方式来理解,那么它表达的
The fifteenth article of the “Teacher Law” in Chapter 6 (treatment) is expressed as follows: “The average wage level of teachers should not be lower or higher than the average salary level of the state’s civil servants, and gradually increase. The establishment of normal salary increments. The system and specific measures are stipulated by the State Council.“ ”The author thinks that the above expression obviously has something wrong. The phrase “not less than or higher than” can easily be misunderstood when people understand it. Because this is an ambiguous phrase. When reading, there are two different kinds of understanding possible due to the different pauses. One is, “not/below or above ”; the other is “ not less than or above ”. If it is understood in terms of the first pause, then it expresses