论文部分内容阅读
在共同犯罪的不作为参与中,相关司法人员不能简单的按照犯罪中犯人们的不同分工进行不同定罪,因为在共同犯罪中的不作为存在着多种本质上的差别,而这些差别影响着相关共同犯罪的具体判决。在共同犯罪的具体判决中,只有不作为与作为犯在案件的构成中占据相同重要的位置,才能将其作为共同犯罪的正犯进行相关审理,这种等价性与我们日常生活中接触的因果关系等理论有着本质不同。本文就共同犯罪中的不作为参与进行论述,希望能对我国相关司法人员的案件审理带来一定的启发作用。
In the non-participation of the common crime, the relevant judicial personnel can not simply convict themselves differently according to the different division of labor of the criminals because there are many kinds of essential differences in the omission of the common crime, and these differences affect the relevant Specific verdicts of joint crime. In the concrete judgment of joint crimes, only as a crime can not be taken as the same important position in the constitution of the case, can it be treated as the principal criminal offense of common crime, which is equivalent to the causal factor of contact in our daily life The theory of relationship is fundamentally different. This article discusses the omission in the common crime, and hopes to bring enlightenment to the trial of the relevant judicial personnel in our country.