腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术与传统开腹手术治疗早期胃癌患者的疗效

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:applee911
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术与传统开腹手术治疗早期胃癌患者的疗效。方法 本研究共纳入北票市中心医院收治的80例胃癌患者为试验对象,时间为2019年1月至2020年12月,依照医治方式的不同划分两组,每组40例。传统组采用传统开腹手术治疗,腹腔镜组采用腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术,对比两组患者的各项手术指标、并发症发生率。结果 腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率为12.50%,传统组为32.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组住院时间、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、切口长度均短于传统组,腹腔镜组术中出血量少“,”Objective To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and traditional open surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Methods A total of 80 patients with early gastric cancer in our hospital were enrolled in this study, and they were divided into two groups according to different treatment schemes, 40 cases in each group. The traditional group was treated with traditional open surgery, and the laparoscopic group was treated with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. The operation indexes and the incidence of complications of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic group was 12.50%, which was significantly lower than that in traditional group 32.50%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The length of hospital stay, anal exhaust time, ambulation time and incision length of laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than those of traditional group, and the intraoperative blood loss of laparoscopic group was less than that of traditional group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and traditional open surgery can achieve certain therapeutic effect in the treatment of patients with early gastric cancer, but the former is better than the latter, which can not only reduce the probability of postoperative complications, but also shorten the hospitalization and ambulation time of patients, which is helpful to accelerate the recovery of patients after operation.
其他文献
目的 针对当前心理护理对于改善老年干部糖尿病患者焦虑抑郁情绪的效果开展深入分析,判断心理护理在临床上对于患者情绪的调控价值。方法 选取我院2019年12月至2020年12月收治的老年干部糖尿病患者100例为研究对象,遵从“乱数表法”分配原则,将参与研究的老年干部糖尿病患者分成两组,两组比例1∶1。研究组50例,在常规护理的基础上给予心理护理;对照组50例,给予常规护理。比较两组的护理效果。结果 护理前,两组患者的焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。护理