论文部分内容阅读
目的观察不孕不育经宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液治疗的效果。方法选取医院收治的不孕不育症患者120例。以数字法随机分成观察组和对照组各60例。观察组行宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液治疗,对照组给予普通的输卵管插管通液治疗,分析比较2组患者在治疗后输卵管的通畅性以及受孕率。结果 2组患者术前在输卵管通畅方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后通畅率均高于术前,通而不畅或单侧不通畅、阻塞率均低于术前(P<0.05),且观察组术后的通畅率为71.67%显著高于对照组的46.67%,通而不畅或单侧不通畅率为8.33%低于对照组的16.67%,阻塞率为20.00%明显低于对照组的36.67%(P<0.05);观察组2年内成功受孕率为75.00%显著高于对照组的45.00%(P<0.05);不良反应率为1.67%显著低于对照组的11.67%(P<0.05)。结论宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液治疗不孕不育,效果佳。
Objective To observe the effect of infertility treated by hysteroscopic tubal intubation. Methods Select 120 cases of infertility patients admitted to hospital. The digital method were randomly divided into observation group and control group of 60 cases. The observation group underwent hysteroscopic tubal intubation fluid treatment, the control group was given ordinary tubal intubation fluid treatment, analysis of two groups of patients after treatment of tubal patency and pregnancy rate. Results There was no significant difference in tubal patency between the two groups before operation (P> 0.05). The patency rates of the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation, poor or unilateral unobstructed, and the occlusion rates were lower than those before operation (P <0.05). The patency rate in the observation group was 71.67% The rate of unobstructed or unilateral patency was 8.33% lower than that of the control group (46.67%), and the obstruction rate was 20.00% (36.67%, P <0.05) The conception rate was 75.00%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (45.00%, P <0.05). Adverse reaction rate was 1.67%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (11.67%, P <0.05). Conclusion hysteroscopic tubal intubation for infertility treatment, good effect.