论文部分内容阅读
就读法律之前我曾在某工厂设计处工作,亲眼目睹了实践中容易出现以下问题:产品出了问题后总是找不到责任承担人。比如一焊接结构件由两个零件组成,焊后装不进原来的位置。车间师傅的操作过程和结果完全符合工艺卡片的要求,很明显是技术上出了问题。但工艺人员辩称:“是因为设计人员未在结构图上标明焊后角度。”设计人员辩称:“零件图上已经有尺寸、公差和角度了。焊接变形是必然现象,工艺应该事前有所预料,并采取夹固定型措施。”
Before going to law, I worked at a factory design office and witnessed in practice that the following problems are easy to occur: The responsible owner can not be found after the product is in trouble. For example, a welded structure consists of two parts, welding does not fit into the original position. The workshop master’s operating process and the results in full compliance with the requirements of the process card, it is clear that there is a technical problem. However, the technician argued: “Because the designer did not indicate the angle of the post-weld on the chart.” The designer argued: “The dimensions, tolerances and angles are already on the part drawing. Welding deformation is an inevitable phenomenon and the process should have Expected, and take the folder fixed measures. ”