科斯教授在《联邦通讯委员会》一文中明确宣示:产权界定是非常重要的,界定后的市场自由转让会自发地导向资源的有效配置。然而市场自由转让依然可能面临着交易成本过高的困难,所以在产权初始界定的阶段就要考虑到这个问题。有关产权界定的最基本法律是物权法,作为物权法的基本原则之一的物权法定原则致力于保证物权的可转让性,强制标准化和反公地悲剧两种理论从不同的侧面可以解释这一点,并在解释过程中透视出物权法定的经济内涵。 Professor Coase in the “Federal Communications Commission,” a clear statement: the definition of property rights is very important, after the definition of the free transfer of markets will be spontaneous to the effective allocation of resources. However, the free transfer of the market may still face the difficulty of high transaction costs, so this issue should be taken into account during the initial definition of property rights. The most basic law about the definition of property rights is the law of property. As one of the basic principles of property law, the principle of real right is committed to ensure the transferability of real rights. Both theories of mandatory standardization and anti-common land tragedy can explain this from different aspects, And in the process of interpretation, we can see the economic connotation of legal rights of property.