对清末司法改革目前有三种评价:一是旧权力的残喘,二是近代化的权舆,三是一种权宜的做法。事实与逻辑在学术研究的客观性与主观性上是变动不居的。对于清末司法改革的动机、行动与成效三个核心问题,视角转变,评判也随之改变,是视角决定了评判。因此,应警惕任何一种绝对的评判,对开拓出相关的问题有着重要的学术意义。 At present, there are three kinds of judgments on the judicial reform in the late Qing Dynasty: one is the old power’s respite, the other is the right of modernization and the third is an expedient approach. Facts and logic are subject to change in the objectivity and subjectivity of academic research. For the three core issues of motivation, action and effectiveness of judiciary reform in the late Qing Dynasty, the perspective changes and judgments also change. Therefore, we should be alert to any kind of absolute judgment and have important academic significance in opening up relevant issues.