论文部分内容阅读
目的:对处在妊娠期的耳鼻喉疾病患者的治疗方法以及临床成效进行讨论与分析。方法:选取我院2012年6月-2015年6月就治的妊娠期耳鼻喉疾病患者200例,随机分为两组各100人,对照组采取保守疗法,观察组则采取射频理疗法与保守疗法相结合的综合治疗方法,通过对两组研究对象的临床疗效、不良反应、患者的满意度等临床数据的比较,得出相应的结论,并做统计学分析。结果:在临床治疗效果方面,观察组的总有效率(96.00%)明显高于对照组(80.00%)的总有效率,差异较为显著(p<0.05);在患者不良反应方面,观察组的不良反应率(7.00%)明显低于对照组(16.00%),差异较为显著(P<0.05);在患者的满意度方面,观察组的满意度(98.00%)明显高于对照组的满意度(67.00%),差异较为显著(p<0.05)。结论:针对处在妊娠期的耳鼻喉疾病患者,射频理疗法与保守疗法相结合的综合治疗方法临床效果更好、不良反应发生率较低、患者的满意度更高,值得在临床中推广应用。
Objective: To discuss and analyze the treatment methods and clinical outcomes of patients with ENT diseases during pregnancy. Methods: 200 cases of ENT patients treated in our hospital from June 2012 to June 2015 were randomly divided into two groups of 100 patients. The control group was treated conservatively while the observation group was treated with radiofrequency therapy and conservative Therapy combined with comprehensive treatment, through the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients, adverse reactions, patient satisfaction and other clinical data comparison, draw the corresponding conclusions and do statistical analysis. Results: The total effective rate (96.00%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (80.00%), with significant difference (p <0.05) in the clinical treatment effect. In the adverse reactions of the observation group The rate of adverse reactions (7.00%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (16.00%) (P <0.05). Satisfaction of the patients in the observation group (98.00%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (67.00%), the difference was more significant (p <0.05). Conclusion: For patients with otolaryngologic diseases during pregnancy, the combination therapy of radiofrequency therapy and conservative therapy has a better clinical effect, a lower incidence of adverse reactions and a higher degree of patient satisfaction, which is worth popularizing in clinic .