2006年9月20日,上海市高级人民法院出台《关于涉及公证民事诉讼若干问题的解答》,其中对于如何确定公证机构赔偿责任的范围作了如下解释:“因当事人提供虚假材料,故意隐瞒真实情况,同时,公证机构在审查、核实中也存在过失,导致错误发生的,由于错误发生是由于公证申请人的故意所致,因此,公证申请人应当承担全部赔偿责任,而公证机构也应当对其相应的过错,承担补充赔偿责任。”这是全国第一次通过司法解释的形式关注公证机构承担补充责任的问题。那么,我们怎样定义公证机构承担补充责任呢?根据补 On September 20, 2006, the Shanghai Higher People’s Court promulgated the “Answers to Several Issues Concerning Notarial Civil Proceedings,” in which it explains how to determine the scope of liability of a notary office as follows: “When the parties provide false materials, they deliberately conceal The actual situation, at the same time, the notary public in the review, verification, there are also errors, resulting in errors, because the error was due to the notary applicant’s intention, therefore, the notary applicant should bear all the liability, and the notary office should also For its corresponding fault, assume the responsibility of supplementary compensation. ”This is the first time in the country that the notary public should take the responsibility for supplementary liability through judicial interpretation. So, how do we define the notary office to assume additional responsibility? According to make up