论文部分内容阅读
20世纪80年代,波兰史学界围绕当代史展开了激烈的争论,并出现了两种新近历史形象的对立,即“正式历史”与未经过审查出版的“对立性历史”。新近历史焦点在于确认主体——历史学家——与他的研究客体相比较,在时间上靠近被讨论或者被记录下来的事件,在时间线上不可能有一个固定点,它随流逝的时间及可延伸的历史情景而“行进”。波兰对新近历史新形象的讨论无疑是更完整的波兰历史研究的一部分。这些讨论的参照点既有与我们有关过去知识的新形式相关的争论及其在美国和西欧学术中呈现的社会地位,也有在其他后共产党国家致力于历史形象的全国性争论。
In the 1980s, the Polish historians of the world started a fierce debate about the contemporary history. There were two kinds of confrontations between the two recent historical images: the “official history” and the “opposition history” without being examined and published. Recent historical focus has been on identifying the subject-historian-in comparison with his research object, temporally close to the event being discussed or recorded, it is not possible to have a fixed point in the timeline, as time elapses And extendable historical scenarios and “travel ”. Poland’s discussion of a new historical image is undoubtedly part of a more complete history of Poland. The points of reference for these discussions are both the controversy associated with our new forms of past knowledge and their social status in the academic studies in the United States and Western Europe, as well as the national debates in other post-communist countries devoted to the historical image.