论文部分内容阅读
目的:了解团体箱庭疗法、团体心理辅导对大学新生适应不良的干预效果,分析两者干预效果出现差异的原因。方法:采用《中国大学生适应量表》(CCSAS)和《症状自评量表》(SCL-90)筛选出14名适应不良的大学新生,将他们分成2组,分别采用限制性团体箱庭疗法和以团体活动为主的团体心理辅导进行干预研究。结果:团体箱庭疗法和团体心理辅导对缓解大学新生适应不良都具有良好的效果,但团体箱庭疗法在缓解情绪适应的效果要优于团体心理辅导。结论:团体箱庭疗法对大学新生适应不良干预效果的持续性更优于团体心理辅导。
OBJECTIVE: To understand the effects of group box therapy and group counseling on the maladaptive effects of college counseling on freshmen, and to analyze the reasons for the differences between the two interventions. METHODS: Fourteen undergraduates who had maladaptive behaviors were screened using the Chinese Students Adaptation Scale (CCSAS) and the Self-rating Symptomatic Symptom Inventory (SCL-90), who were divided into two groups. Restricted group courtroom therapy and Intervention study with group counseling based on group activities. Results: The group boxing therapy and group counseling had good effect on alleviating the maladjustment of university freshmen, but the group boxing therapy was better than the group counseling in relieving the emotional adaptation. Conclusion: The success of group box-office therapy adapting to adverse reactions to college freshmen is better than that of group psychological counseling.