论文部分内容阅读
1933年间,北平相继出现了两种大型文学杂志《文学杂志》和《文艺月报》。体裁与内容相似的这两种公开杂志之间有何关系?关于《文学杂志》,据当时左联负责人员陆万美的证言,它被当做了北方左联的机关刊物。但朱正以王志之在其《鲁迅印象记》里所描写的该杂志发刊筹备的情况为证据,主张它不是左联机关刊物。我再三慎重斟酌两种杂志的内容以及两位论者的主张,最后得出了如下结论:与朱正的主张相反,我认为《文学杂志》的产生是北方左联在纠正“关门主义”的过程中所做的实践之一。但这个富有重要意义的尝试也被文总(即指导左联的上级机关)视为“右倾化”的产物而拒绝了。负责开展左联活动的潘漠华、陆万美等人受到批判,左联又改变了方向。《文艺月报》是在文总的指导下以北平社联的负责人员为中心创办的刊物,它是在推动北方左联全体走上“左倾”路线起了很大作用的一种杂志。
In 1933, two large literary magazines “Literary Magazine” and “Literary Monthly” appeared successively in Peiping. What is the relationship between the two public magazines, whose genres and contents are similar? Regarding “Literary Magazine,” according to the testimony of Lu Wanmei, the then director of the Left Association, it was treated as an organ of the Left-leaning Federation of the North. However, Zhu Zheng regards the preparation of the journal described by Wang Zhizhi in his “Impressions of Lu Xun” as evidence that it is not a publication of the Left Bank. Again and again, I carefully consider the contents of the two magazines and the opinions of the two theorists. Finally, I come to the following conclusion: Contrary to Zhu’s claim, I think the emergence of “literary magazine” is the result of the rectification of “Leftist” One of the practices done in the process. However, this very important attempt was rejected by the Wenzong (ie, the superior authority that guides the Left Federation) as a product of “rightist”. Pan Mo-hua, Lu Wan-mei and others who were responsible for carrying out the activities of the League of Left-in-hand were criticized and the League of Left-handies changed its course. The monthly “Literary Monthly” is a magazine founded mainly by responsible persons of the Peiping Social Union under the general guidance of the general public. It is a magazine that has played a significant role in pushing the entire northern leftist group onto the “leftist” line .