信访自身的因素,如收案范围过于广泛而导致基层信访难以终结,对信访自身因素产生的困境需要基于信访的性质进行制度设计以破解难题。信访综合有权利救济以及政治参与的性质,前者可以以严格的法律程序终结,而后者则难以用规定严格的法律处理程序而实施终结,因此对于政治参与型的信访可以允许其合法存在而不让其终结。基层信访的终结还受到基层维稳的重要影响,在维稳需求之下,信访考核制度导致信访的异化,只有认识并确立维稳是维护法律秩序的稳定而不是简单地减少信访,才可能减少维稳对信访的影响。基层维稳要求信访在法律框架内合法终结即可,而不是在数量上压制信访,不是追求是否能够“息诉罢访”。 The factors of petitioning itself, such as the scope of the petition is too wide and the petitioning at the grassroots level is hard to come to an end. The predicament caused by the petition itself needs to be institutionalized to solve the problem based on the nature of petitions. The combination of petitions with the right to remedy and the nature of political participation, the former can be concluded with strict legal procedures, while the latter is difficult to implement the strict legal procedures and the implementation of the end, so the petition for political participation can allow its legal existence rather than It ends. The end of grassroots petition is also affected by the stability and stability of the grassroots. Under the demand of maintaining stability, the petition examination and assessment system leads to the alienation of letters and visits. Only by knowing and establishing stability is the stability of legal order rather than simply reducing petitions, Impact. Grass-roots maintenance requirements of the petition letter of law within the legal framework of the legal end can be, rather than suppressing the number of petitions, is not the pursuit of whether the “interest strike”.