论文部分内容阅读
生态批评研究自上世纪九十年代出现至今,其研究角度虽然越来越多样化,但城市维度却始终处于缺失的状态。在生态批评的多次发展浪潮中,本应成为重要一环的城市生态批评虽然曾浮现过短暂的涟漪,但更多偏向于社会学研究,而且在之后也陷入了漫长的断层与沉寂期。长期以来,无论是阐释作为文本的城市,还是在文本中再现的城市,城市与自然一直处于分离甚至对立的状态之中,导致城市成为自然书写中的一种空隙。在这一背景下,我们有必要重新发现和认知城市自然,对自然的概念进行再定义,将环境研究、文化研究与城市研究联系起来,完成生态批评的城市维度从缺席到在场的转变。
Since the nineties of the last century, the research on ecocriticism has been diversified, but the urban dimension has always been in a state of lack. In the wave of multiple development of ecocriticism, ecocriticism, which should be an important part, has tended to be short-term ripples. However, it tends to be more sociological research and later plunged into a long period of fault and silence. For a long time, both the city as a text and the city reproduced in the text have always been in a state of separation or even antagonism, causing the city to become a gap in the writing of nature. Against this background, it is necessary for us to rediscover and recognize urban nature, to redefine the concept of nature, to link environmental studies and cultural studies with urban research, and to change the city dimension of ecological criticism from absence to presence.