论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨快速血糖仪与检验科测定血糖结果之间的差异。方法选取2013年1月—2014年1月在驻马店市精神病医院行血糖测试的64例患者进行研究,比较快速血糖检测仪以及实验室血糖检测结果的差异性和相关性。结果 64例患者中血糖水平<4.2mmol/ml患者10例,所有检测结果偏差在+0.81mmol/ml,剩余患者血糖水平>4.2mmol/ml,超过98.4%的患者其结果偏差均控制在+20%;血糖检测偏差值均控制在合理区间内。快速血糖检测仪平均血糖检测结果为(9.41±4.96)mmol/ml,而检验科全自动生化检测仪平均血糖检测结果为(8.91±3.96)mmol/ml,两种方法比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论检验科检测血糖结果与快速血糖仪检测结果对血糖的检测均有重要参考意义,两种检测方法各有优势,快速检测仪在检测血糖的精确度和准确度方面更符合临床研究,而检验科全自动生化分析仪在临床应用范围更广泛,建议对两组检测结果酌情比对,以便确定最佳检测结果。
Objective To explore the difference between rapid blood glucose meter and laboratory blood sugar determination. Methods Sixty-four patients undergoing glucose test in psychiatric hospital of Zhumadian City from January 2013 to January 2014 were selected to study the differences and correlations between the rapid blood glucose meter and laboratory blood glucose test results. Results The blood glucose level was lower than 4.2mmol / ml in 10 patients in 64 patients, the deviation of all the test results was + 0.81mmol / ml, and the remaining patients’ blood glucose level was> 4.2mmol / ml. The results were more than + 20 %; Blood glucose detection bias values are controlled within a reasonable range. The average blood glucose test result of fast glucose meter was (9.41 ± 4.96) mmol / ml, while the average blood glucose test result of automatic biochemical analyzer was (8.91 ± 3.96) mmol / ml. There was no significant difference between the two methods P> 0.05). Conclusion The test results of blood glucose test and fast blood glucose meter test results have important reference value for blood sugar test. The two test methods have their own advantages. The rapid test meter is more in line with clinical research in detecting blood glucose accuracy and accuracy, Branch full automatic biochemical analyzer in the clinical application of a more extensive, it is recommended that the two sets of test results, as appropriate, in order to determine the best test results.