论文部分内容阅读
2016年11月10日,江苏作家荆歌在《文学报》发表了《两个周洁茹》一文,谈起了同毕飞宇、周洁茹、荆歌打“欠一夜”的欠条一事。这触动了河北邯郸老曹(曹澍)的道德神经,撰写了《毕飞宇,你实在不应该这样做》(载《文学自由谈》2017年第1期)进行批评。2017年2月4日,《文学报》微信公众号刊发了当年事件参与者朱辉《对荆歌〈两个周洁茹〉一文的说明》,老曹又撰写了《是谁让毕飞宇“躺枪”?》(载《文学自由谈》2017年第2期)进行反驳。两文均挥舞着道德的大棒,批评得看似合情合理,却是上纲上线。毕飞宇可不可以发言?
On November 10, 2016, Jingu, a writer in Jiangsu Province, published an article entitled “Two Zhou Jie Ru” in the “Literary Journal” and talked about the issue of IOU with Bi Feiyu, Zhou Jieru and Jing Ge. This touched the moral nerve of Cao Cao in Handan, Hebei Province, and wrote a commentary on Bi Feiyu, which you really should not do (No. 1, 2017, Freedom of Literature). On February 4, 2017, the “WeChat” WeChat public number published a statement by Zhu Hui, an event participant, on his article entitled “Two Zhou Jie Ruins of Jing Ge”. Lao Cao also wrote “Who Made Bi Feiyu” Gun “?” (Contained in “Freedom of Literature” 2017 the second period) to refute. Both texts are waving the stick of morality, criticism seems plausible, but it is on the line. Bi Feiyu can speak?