论文部分内容阅读
在判案执法的实际过程之中,如何看待和处理皇帝诏旨与国家法律之间的关系?古代一直存在着以酷吏、循吏为代表的两种不同观点的对立。西汉时期杜周、张释之的两个典故,就很有代表性,值得认真思考。汉武帝时期的杜周,与张汤同为酷吏之首。他在担任朝廷专职司法长官——廷尉之时,完全根据皇帝的态度来判案断狱。凡是皇帝有意重罚的人,杜周一定会找到法律的依据加以构陷;凡是皇帝有意开释的人,杜周也总能找到所谓的“冤状”而予以释放。有人当面批评杜
How to treat and handle the relationship between imperial edict and national law in the actual process of enforcing the law? There has always been the contradiction between two different views, represented by cruel officials and followers, in ancient times. Two allusions, Du Zhou and Zhang Shi Zhi during the Western Han Dynasty, were very representative and worth serious consideration. Du Zhou in the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, and Zhang Tang Tong as the first official. When he served as court full-time justice - Ting Wei, completely according to the emperor’s attitude to sentenced to prison break. Anyone who intends to impose heavy penalties on the emperor will find the basis for the law to be trapped by Du Zhou. For those who deliberately release the emperor, Du Zhou can always find the so-called “injustice” and release it. Someone criticized Du face to face