论文部分内容阅读
学术刊物最闪耀的部分在于其学术讨论和学术争鸣。我看律来主张对于我看已经发表的文章进行进一步分析讨论 ,一方面可以进一步明确其中的一些疑难问题 ,弥补作者和编委所作工作之不足。另一方面 ,也可以活跃刊物的学术气氛 ,共同推进刊物的学术质量。本期刊发鲁君泰等《对〈迟发性心脏破裂死亡引起医疗纠纷 1例〉一文的看法》是一篇很不错的文章 ,作者能够针对原文提供的资料 ,参阅文献 ,分析、诠释该案例可能涉及的医学问题 ,在充分分析论证的基础上提出作者的观点。我们希望更多的读者、作者能够对我们已经发表的文章提出新的观点和讨论 ,我们也愿意刊发更多的这类文章 ,多提宝贵意见。
The most shining part of academic journals is their academic discussion and academic debate. I think the law advocates a further analysis and discussion of the articles I have already published. On the one hand, we can further clarify some of these difficult problems and make up for the lack of work done by the author and the editorial board. On the other hand, it is also possible to revitalize the academic atmosphere of the publications and jointly promote the academic quality of the publications. This issue published by Lu Juntai and other “on the delayed cardiac death caused by medical malpractice in one case” article is a very good article, the author can provide information for the original, see the literature, analysis, interpretation of the Case may involve medical problems, based on the full analysis of the arguments put forward by the author’s point of view. We hope that more readers and authors will be able to come up with new ideas and discussions on the articles that we have published. We are also willing to publish more such articles and make more valuable comments.