论文部分内容阅读
在台湾,讯问被告人制作笔录,不论是检察机关,抑或是警察机关,重罪、轻罪任何案件一律都必须要全程连续录音;必要时,并应全程连续录像,资以作为证明认定被告犯行之证据,具关键性作用。从客观效果而言,录音、录像的记录方式比传统的笔录方式更为有利于准确地固定和保全被告、犯罪嫌疑人的供述和辩解,一方面可以透过录音、录像过程真实呈现原貌,另一方面可以使讯问过程透明化,有利于保障被告、犯罪嫌疑人在刑事诉讼上的合法权益,一定程度上减少刑讯逼供等非法讯问现象的发生。此外,为落实被告人权、建构公平正义的诉讼制度,还引介台湾刑事审判庭上的录音、录像制度法制化,录音、录像光盘交付等规定与相关争议,以及台湾最高法院裁判相关案件之见解等,冀供参考借鉴。
In Taiwan, interrogating the defendant to make transcripts, whether prosecutorial or police, felony or misdemeanor, must be continuously and continuously recorded in all cases. If necessary, the defendant should be continuously videotaping as proof that the defendant committed the crime Evidence, with a key role. In terms of objective effects, recording and recording of video and audio recordings are more conducive to accurately fixing and preserving defendants’ confessions and excuses of criminal suspects than traditional recording methods. On the one hand, they can truly present the original appearance through recording and video recording. On the other hand, On the one hand, it can make the interrogation process transparent and help protect the defendants and criminal suspects’ legal rights and interests in criminal proceedings and to some extent reduce the incidence of illegal interrogation such as torture. In addition, in order to implement the defendant’s human rights and establish a fair and just litigation system, it also introduces provisions and related controversies concerning the recording and legal system of the video recording system of Taiwan’s criminal courts, the delivery of audio-visual recordings and video discs, and the opinions of Taiwan’s Supreme Court on adjudication-related cases. , For reference for reference.