论文部分内容阅读
法律修辞对提升司法过程的质量有着重要意义。从历史发展的角度来看,法律修辞具有微观和宏观两种层次的含义:前者侧重于技巧或者技艺层面,后者则突出了方法论的因素。单纯技艺层面的法律修辞无法满足现代司法强调对话和协商的要求,法律修辞应当更加注重方法层面的含义。法律修辞的两种层次及其相互关系能够给我们的司法实践带来有益的启示。
Legal rhetoric is of great importance to improve the quality of judicial process. From the perspective of historical development, legal rhetoric has two levels of micro and macro meaning: the former focuses on the level of skill or skill, while the latter highlights the methodological factors. Legal rhetoric at a purely technical level can not meet the requirements of modern judicial emphasis on dialogue and consultation. Legal rhetoric should pay more attention to the meaning of the method level. The two levels of legal rhetoric and their mutual relations can bring beneficial enlightenment to our judicial practice.