论文部分内容阅读
目的分析湿性愈合与干性愈合理论在封闭气管切开感染创口临床护理中的效果。方法选择我院收治的需气管切开的患者70例,随机分为两组,各35例。对照组实施干性愈合护理干预,观察组实施湿性愈合护理干预。比较两组患者临床疗效、换药次数及切口恢复时间。结果观察组换药次数、切口恢复时间与对照组相比均有降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与干性愈合护理相比,湿性愈合护理用于封闭气管切开感染创口中的治疗效果更佳,能有效的提高患者的治疗有效率,减少换药次数,缩短切口恢复时间。
Objective To analyze the effect of wet healing and dry healing on the clinical nursing of tracheotomy wounds. Methods Select 70 cases of tracheotomy patients admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, 35 cases each. In the control group, dry healing nursing intervention was performed and in observation group, wet healing nursing intervention was performed. The clinical efficacy, dressing change and incision recovery time were compared between the two groups. Results The number of dressing change and incision recovery time in the observation group decreased compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the dry healing nursing, wet healing nursing is more effective in the treatment of closed tracheotomy wounds, which can effectively improve the treatment efficiency, reduce the number of dressing changes and shorten the recovery time of incision.