论文部分内容阅读
《修正案(八)》于今年5月1日开始生效,对于醉酒驾驶行为有了相关刑事法律规定加以调整。在司法实践中,如何适用危险驾驶罪处理这类案件也成为了社会高度关注的热点。此次,危险驾驶罪的设置采取了抽象危险犯的模式,体现了刑法介入的早期化,为了限制处罚范围,防止刑法对国民行动自由的不当干预,只有认清抽象危险犯的概念及性质,才能确保处罚的妥当性和合法性。本文从抽象危险犯入手,分析并厘清了醉酒驾驶行为的主观心态、犯罪形态、醉酒标准等方面的认定,并提出了该罪的相关立法修改建议,旨在完善危险驾驶罪的相关内容,有助于在今后司法实践中,更为妥帖地适用刑法处理此类犯罪。
The Amendment (8), which came into force on May 1 this year, is subject to the relevant criminal laws and regulations to regulate drunken driving. In judicial practice, how to deal with such cases of dangerous driving offense has also become a hot spot of great concern to the society. This time, the setting of dangerous driving offense adopted the mode of abstract dangerous crime, embodying the early intervention of criminal law. In order to limit the scope of punishment and prevent improper interference of criminal law on freedom of national action, only by clearly understanding the concept and nature of abstract dangerous criminals, Can we ensure the validity and legitimacy of punishment. This article starts from the abstract dangerous criminals, analyzes and clarifies the subjective psychology of drunken driving behavior, criminal patterns, drunkenness standards and other aspects of identification, and proposes the relevant legislative amendments to the crime, aimed at improving the relevant content of dangerous driving offense, there In the future judicial practice, it will be more appropriate to apply criminal law to deal with such crimes.