论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察液氮冷冻治疗宫颈糜烂临床疗效并分析总结方法。方法:分析我院门诊妇科2010年1月-2012年1月来收治的宫颈糜烂的70例患者随机分为两组,对照组35例:常规的西药对症治疗宫颈糜烂;治疗组35例:液氮冷冻治疗宫颈糜烂。将两组的临床资料进行整理分析以及探讨液氮冷冻治疗的优缺点。结果:经治疗后,两组患者宫颈糜烂得到不同程度的缓解,治疗组临床症状的改善优于对照组,治疗组总有效率97.1%高于对照组总有效率88.6%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:两种方案治疗宫颈糜烂均有疗效,对照组治疗作用缓慢,治疗组采用液氮冷冻治疗慢性子宫糜烂的操作方法及术后的护理对于患者治愈率有很大的关系,值得临床上推广应用,所以要好好掌握相关技术,给患者解除痛苦。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of liquid nitrogen freezing in the treatment of cervical erosion and to analyze and summarize the method. Methods: Analysis of 70 cases of cervical erosion treated in our hospital from January 2010 to January 2012 were randomly divided into two groups, the control group of 35 cases: the conventional western medicine symptomatic treatment of cervical erosion; the treatment group of 35 patients: liquid Nitrogen freezing treatment of cervical erosion. The clinical data of two groups were analyzed and the advantages and disadvantages of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy were discussed. Results: After treatment, cervical erosion in both groups was relieved to some extent. The improvement of clinical symptoms in the treatment group was better than that in the control group. The total effective rate was 97.1% in the treatment group and 88.6% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions: Both of the two regimens have curative effects on cervical erosion and the control group has a slow therapeutic effect. The treatment group treated with liquid nitrogen cryotherapy for chronic uterine erosions has a great relationship with the cure rate of patients with chronic uterine erosion, which is worthy of clinical promotion Application, so to master the relevant technology, relieve pain to patients.