论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同雾化吸入方式治疗老年急性支气管哮喘发作的临床疗效。方法 90例老年急性支气管哮喘患者,随机分为氧气雾化吸入组和超声雾化吸入组,每组45例,氧气雾化吸入组采用氧气雾化吸入治疗,超声雾化吸入组采用超声雾化吸入治疗。比较两组的临床效果以及临床症状消失时间。结果治疗1周后,氧气雾化吸入组与超声雾化吸入组疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);氧气雾化吸入组临床症状消失时间明显低于超声雾化吸入组(P<0.05)。结论临床治疗老年急性支气管哮喘时,氧气雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入疗效相当,但氧气雾化吸入对临床症状的消失有明显影响,可控制疾病的发展,因此更有临床应用价值。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of different inhalation methods for the treatment of senile acute bronchial asthma. Methods Ninety elderly patients with acute bronchial asthma were randomly divided into oxygen atomization inhalation group and ultrasonic atomization inhalation group, with 45 cases in each group. Oxygen aerosol inhalation group was treated by oxygen atomization inhalation. Ultrasonic atomization Inhalation therapy. The clinical effects and disappearance of clinical symptoms were compared between the two groups. Results After 1 week of treatment, there was no significant difference in the therapeutic effect between oxygen atomized inhalation group and ultrasonic atomized inhalation group (P> 0.05). The disappearance time of clinical symptoms in oxygen atomized inhalation group was significantly lower than that of ultrasonic atomized inhalation group ). Conclusions Oxygen atomization inhalation has the same effect as ultrasonic atomization inhalation in the treatment of senile acute bronchial asthma. However, oxygen atomization inhalation has a significant effect on the disappearance of clinical symptoms and can control the development of the disease, so it has more clinical value.