论文部分内容阅读
罗平汉在《人民论坛》2011年第10期上撰文指出:近一段时期以来,在一些书籍、评论文章和网上贴文中出现不少为个别有代表性的地主(比如刘文彩)“正名”、“翻案”的声音,甚至称要对“土改运动”进行重新评价,争论激烈。一个国家或地区,要想实现工业化,都要完成土地改革,改变原有的封建土地制度,消灭地主阶级,只是土改的方式可能各不相同。首先,不能将反霸减租运动中对恶霸分子的斗争,等同于对地主的斗争。周扒皮、黄世仁、南霸天和刘文彩这些人们头脑中典型的地主形象,都是经过艺术加工将各种坏地主、恶霸地主的种种恶行集中体现,成为恶霸地主各种恶行之集大成者,都不可与现实中的地主完全划等号。各地在进行土地改革前,均开
In his article “People’s Forum,” 2011, No.10, Luo Pinghan pointed out: In recent years, there have been many representative landlords (such as Liu Wencai) and “proper names” in some books, commentary articles and online postings. , “Turning over the case”, and even claimed that we should re-evaluate the “land reform movement” and the debate was fierce. If a country or region wants to realize industrialization, it must complete the land reform, change the original feudal land system and eliminate the landlord class, but the ways of land reform may vary. First of all, the struggle against bully elements in the anti-tyrant rent-reducing campaign can not be equated with the struggle against landowners. Zhou Papi, Huang Shiren, Nauba Tian and Liu Wencai these typical people in the minds of the image of the landlords, all through the art processing will be all kinds of bad landowners, bully landowners all kinds of evil embodied as a bully, Can not be completely equated with the real landowners. Before the implementation of the land reform around, are open