论文部分内容阅读
目的讨论客观性新近信息对大学生自我评价的影响及情绪反应。方法依据给予被试的反馈信息的不同将被试分为3组:正面组,负面组和控制组。通过计算机给3组被试呈现20道语文推理测验题,要求被试在10分钟内完成并给按照事先随机划分的3组被试呈现不同的反馈信息,随后要求被试完成认知量表、情绪量表和自信心量表测试。结果1对信息本身的评价:语文能力信心维度正面组和负面组有显著差异(t=2.320,P=026);2自我评价:自我表现维度各组有显著差异(F(2,52)=13.9,P=0.000),经Posthoc-Tukey检验发现负面组(M=3.8)与控制组(M=5.000)以及负面组与正面组(M=5.400)有显著性差异;3自身能力维度各组有显著差异(F=(2,52)=3.823,P=0.028),进一步检验发现,正面组(M=5.350)与负面组(M=4.500)有明显的差别;各组的情绪反应方面有显著差异(F=(2,52)=12.56,P=0.000),进一步检验发现,正面组和控制组的得分显著高于负面组,而正面组得分虽然有高于控制组的趋势,但不显著。结论接受新近信息的正面组被试比负面组被试和控制组被试对自己有较高的自我评价和积极的情绪反应,并将其内归因。
Objective To discuss the influence of recent objectivity information on college students’ self-evaluation and their emotional responses. Methods According to the different feedback information given to the subjects, the subjects were divided into three groups: positive group, negative group and control group. The subjects were asked to complete 20 Chinese reasoning test questions by computer to ask subjects to finish within 10 minutes and present different feedback information to 3 groups of subjects according to pre-randomization. Then they were asked to complete the cognitive scale, Emotional scales and self-confidence test. Results 1 Evaluation of the information itself: There was a significant difference between the positive and negative groups (t = 2.320, P = 026); 2 Self-evaluation: Self- 13.9, P = 0.000). Posthoc-Tukey test showed that the negative group (M = 3.8) and the control group (M = 5.000) and the negative group and the positive group (M = 5.400) There was a significant difference (F = (2,52) = 3.823, P = 0.028). Further tests showed that there was a significant difference between the positive group (M = 5.350) and the negative group (M = 4.500) There was a significant difference (F = (2,52) = 12.56, P = 0.000). Further tests showed that the score of the positive group and the control group was significantly higher than that of the negative group, while the score of the positive group was higher than that of the control group Significant. CONCLUSIONS: Positive group participants who received recent information had a higher self-rating and positive emotional response than negative group participants and control group subjects, attributing them to them.