论文部分内容阅读
作为赵芸的代理人,我认为本 案应适用过错责任原则,法院应对 损害结果负损害赔偿责任,当事人 赵芸不负责任。 一、关于过错的认定 过错的基本形式包括故意与过失,其中过失的过错是主要形式。法院作为提供法律服务的特定公共场所,有法定义务对前来打官司的有关人员的人身财产安全负有适当的注意义务。在本案中,法院在工作日打扫卫生,是应知该日会有人前来打官司。民庭在办公楼第四层,楼面为水磨石地面,用洗衣粉擦洗,从一个合理的、谨慎的人的行为标准来看,是能够预见到如任污水下滴,如不采取材警示牌或其他有效措施,会导致来访人员摔倒、摔伤的损害结果。
As Zhao Yun’s agent, I think this case should apply the principle of fault liability, the court should bear the damage liability for damages, the parties Zhao Yun irresponsible. First, the determination of fault The basic form of fault, including intentional and fault, of which the fault of fault is the main form. The court, as a specific public place providing legal services, has the statutory obligation to pay due attention to the personal and property safety of the officers who come to court. In this case, the court cleans the health on the working day and should know that someone will come to litigate this day. The courtroom is on the fourth floor of an office building with a terrazzo floor and scrubbed with detergent. Judging from a reasonable and cautious standard of conduct, it is possible to foresee any drops of water, without a warning sign or Other effective measures will lead to visitors fall, the consequences of injury damage.