汉纳主张对康德知识论的经验式解读:直观是独立于知性的表象,属于感性范畴。直观的客观有效性来自于先验的时间和空间。“非全等对应物”表明,显像与其非全等对应物之间的根本区别在于先验的空间结构,而非知性的概念因素。对直观的超验解读否定其独立性,强调“协调”原则在知识产生中的作用,这实际上回到了康德“思维无内容则空,直观无概念则盲”的主张。 Hanna advocated the empirical interpretation of Kant’s epistemology: intuition is independent of intellectual appearance, belongs to the emotional category. Intuitive objective validity comes from a priori time and space. “Non-congruent counterparts” show that the fundamental difference between visualization and its non-congruent counterparts is the a priori spatial structure, not the notion of a conceptual one. Negating the independence of intuitive transcendental interpretation and stressing the role of the principle of “coordination” in knowledge production actually returns to Kant’s notion that “no content is empty without thinking and blind without intuition”.