论文部分内容阅读
分析了《中国学术期刊网络计量测试报告》(2004年版)上公布的368种农学期刊4项网上文献计量指标统计数据;将《中国学术期刊综合引证报告》(2004年版)上公布的418种农学期刊根据全文上网程度的不同划分为3组,对这3组期刊的网上和印刷版本6项文献计量指标作了比较;对开放存取与非开放存取农学期刊的网上和印刷版本6项文献计量指标分别作了比较。结果表明:①总体上,农学期刊的网上影响力和网上的即时反应速率相对较低,农学期刊的读者利用网络的能力可能较低。②期刊全文上网程度与3项网上文献计量指标正相关;对于相应的印刷版本,总被引频次、影响因子和即年指标3项指标均随着全文上网程度的提高而提高。③开放存取农学期刊的3项网上文献计量指标和3项印刷版文献计量指标均分别高于非开放存取农学期刊的指标。基于上述分析和比较结果,针对不同类别期刊,提出了我国农学期刊提高网上影响力的策略。
This paper analyzes the statistical data of 4 online literature metrics of 368 agricultural journals published in the “China Academic Journals Network Measurement Test Report” (2004 edition), 418 agricultural sciences published in the “China Academic Journals Comprehensive Citation Report” (2004 edition) The periodicals were divided into three groups according to the degree of full-text internet access. Six articles of online and printed editions of the three periodicals were compared. Six articles on online and printed versions of open access and non-open access to agricultural periodicals Metrics were compared separately. The results showed that: (1) Generally speaking, the online influence of agricultural periodicals and the instantaneous response rate on the Internet are relatively low, and the readers of agricultural periodicals may have a lower ability to use the Internet. ② The degree of full-text access to the journal is positively related to the three online literatures. For the corresponding printed editions, the total cited frequency, the impact factor and the three indicators of the immediate indicator are all increased with the improvement of the full-text access. ③ The three online literatures and three metric items in open access agronomy journals were respectively higher than those in non-open access journals. Based on the above analysis and comparison results, for different types of periodicals, this paper put forward the strategy of improving the online influence of Chinese agronomy journals.