目的修订、引进儿童心理行为障碍偏见量表(BTCWPABDS),并评价其在我国的信效度。方法对英文版BTCWPABDS进行系统评价和翻译,应用中文版BTCWPABDS对415名医务人员、教师及其他社会人员进行问卷调查,并对调查结果进行统计分析。结果修订后中文版BTCWPABDS包含20个条目;总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.83,量表总的重测信度为0.76(P<0.01)。探索性因子分析共提取出两个因子,条目的因子负荷为0.26~0.66(P<0.05),两个因子的组合信度分别为0.81、0.66;验证性因素分析表明2因素模型拟合良好:NFI=0.84,IFI=0.93,TLI=0.90,CFI=0.93,χ~2/df=1.67,RMSEA=0.048,均符合测量学要求。结论中文版BTCWPABDS具有良好的信度和效度,可作为测评不同人群对心理行为障碍儿童的偏见态度的评估工具。 Objective To amend and introduce the Child Psychological and Behavioral Disorder Prejudice Scale (BTCWPABDS), and evaluate its reliability and validity in our country. Methods The English version of BTCWPABDS was systematically evaluated and translated. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 415 medical staff, teachers and other social workers using the Chinese version of BTCWPABDS, and the results of the survey were statistically analyzed. Results The revised Chinese version of BTCWPABDS contained 20 entries; the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total scale was 0.83 and the overall test-retest reliability was 0.76 (P <0.01). Exploratory factor analysis extracted two factors, the factor load of the items was 0.26 ~ 0.66 (P <0.05), the reliability of the combination of the two factors were 0.81 and 0.66, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 2-factor model fit well: NFI = 0.84, IFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.90, CFI = 0.93, χ ~ 2 / df = 1.67, RMSEA = 0.048. Conclusion The Chinese version of BTCWPABDS has good reliability and validity and can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the prejudice attitudes of different groups of children with mental and behavioral disorders.