论文部分内容阅读
历史教学法是一门年青的科学,苏联历史界曾对关于历史教学法的内容和结构问题进行了讨论,很多历史教学法专家先后在“学校历史教学”上发表了论文,其中比较重要的有:卡尔曹夫:“论历史教学法的任务和内容”(一九五四年第四号)、安特列也夫斯基:“论历史教学法教程的任务、对象和结构”(一九五四年第六号)、杨柯·特烈尼茨卡娅:“论历史教学法教科书的内容和结构问题”(一九五五年第三号)、贝尔那德斯基:“论历史教学的理论的两大任务”(一九五五年四号)、A·Я·柯科夫:“论历史教学法的内容和体系问题”(一九五六年第六号).就以上论文来看,苏联一般历史教学法专家,对于某些问题的看法,基本上是一致的.如历史教学法是分科教学法之一,它是属于教育科学体系的一门科学.又如历史
The history teaching method is a young science. The history of the Soviet Union once discussed the content and structure of the historical teaching method. Many historical teaching method experts have published their thesis on the “school history teaching”, which is more important than ever. There are: Karl Caofu: “On the task and content of the history teaching method ” (No. 4 of 1954), Antrey Yevski: “On the task, object and Structure ”(No. 6 of 1954), Youngko Tretnitzskaya: “The content and structure of the history teaching method textbook” (No. 3 of 1955), Bell Nadsky: “On the Two Major Tasks of the Theory of Historical Teaching” (No. 4 of 1955), A. Cohen: “On the Content and System of the History Teaching Method” (" (No. 6 of 1956). From the above thesis, the experts of the Soviet Union’s general history teaching method are basically consistent in their views on certain issues. If the historical teaching method is one of the pedagogical methods, it belongs to A science in education science system. Another example is history