论文部分内容阅读
新刑事诉讼法对逮捕条件进行了修改和细化,突出强化了对犯罪嫌疑人合法权益的保护。其中,对于轻微刑事案件1的“社会危险性”的把握和认定具有一定的预测性和自由裁量空间,这也对审查逮捕工作提出了更高要求。因此,司法实践中,如何能够在贯彻“慎捕”司法精神的同时使无社会危险性不捕能够减少争议、实现法律效果与社会效果的统一,是批捕部门需要探索的问题之一。本文结合检察机关审查逮捕工作实践,从轻微刑事案件“社会危险性”的认定和不捕机制的构建出发,对司法实践中存在的问题与解决思路等方面进行探讨,以求更好地理解与把握修改后刑诉法关于逮捕条件的规定。
The new Code of Criminal Procedure amended and refined the conditions of arrest, highlighting the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects. Among them, there is a certain degree of predictability and discretion in grasping and identifying the “social danger” of minor criminal cases, which also puts higher demands on the review of arrests. Therefore, in judicial practice, how to carry out the judicial spirit of “cautiously arresting” and at the same time make it possible to reduce disputes and achieve the unification of legal effects and social effects without the danger of social danger is one of the issues to be explored by the arresting departments. This paper, combined with the practice of procuratorial organs examining arrests, starts from the construction of the identification and non-arrest of minor criminal cases and “social dangers”, discusses the existing problems and solutions in judicial practice, Understand and Grasp the Amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law about the Conditions of Arrest.