论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,指称问题一直是逻辑学、哲学和语言学共同关注的焦点。克里普克以自己独创的模态逻辑语义学为基础,不仅挑战了以弗雷格、罗素等一直倡导的摹状词理论的统治地位,还提出了以可能世界,严格指示词为支撑的历史因果的命名理论,克里普克的命名理论从语言的社会功能角度研究专名问题,克服了传统指称理论的很多具有争议性的不足。对于指称理论来说,提供了新的研究指称问题的思路和视角。本文试图通过立体螺旋线解析此理论,从一个前所未有的角度分析克里普克的历史因果理论。
For a long time, the issue of allegations has always been the focus of common concern in logic, philosophy and linguistics. Based on his own modal logic semantics, Kripke challenged not only the dominance of the tracing theory that Frege, Russell and others had always advocated, but also the possibility of using the possible world and the strict directives The historical causal naming theory and Kripke’s nomenclature theory study the problem of proper names from the perspective of social function of language, which overcomes many controversial issues of the traditional theory of reference. For the theory of reference, it provides a new way of thinking and perspective for the study of allegations. This article tries to analyze Kripke’s theory of historical causality from an unprecedented perspective through the analysis of this theory by means of a three-dimensional spiral.