世纪之交 ,鲁迅遭到了葛红兵、王朔和冯骥才等人的“酷评” ,并由此引发了轰轰烈烈的大讨论。讨论的焦点主要集中在鲁迅的人格和精神、思想家的地位、作品及价值取向等方面。讨论过程中“酷评”者的语言及灵魂表演昭显出其虚无主义的历史观 ,而鲁迅研究者从不同的角度进行了有力的回应。讨论由于拘泥于“现在” ,并没有深入到鲁迅的精神深部。 At the turn of the century, Lu Xun was criticized by such people as Ge Hongbing, Wang Shuo, Feng Jicai and others, and triggered a vigorous debate. The discussion focused mainly on the personality and spirit of Lu Xun, the status of thinkers, works and value orientation. During the discussion, the language and soul performances of “cool critics” showed their nihilistic view of history, and the researchers of Lu Xun responded energetically from different angles. Discussion sticking to the “present”, did not go deep into the spirit of Lu Xun.