20世纪90年代以来,关于20世纪中国文学史的书写,已经成为学界的热点话题。一方面学界热衷于写史,大同小异的《中国现代文学史》层出不穷,据说有上千部之多;另一方面对中国现代文学断代、分段、命名、性质、成绩与局限,又争议不断,有学者干脆放弃“新文学”“现代文学”的概念,提出了“民国文学”的叙述框架。相比较而言,海外学者没有像国内学界如此强烈的写史冲动,文学史写作一直不温不火,但是很显然,这些文 Since the 1990s, writing about the history of Chinese literature in the 20th century has become a hot topic in academic circles. On the one hand, academics are keen on writing history. The history of Chinese modern literature is similar in many ways and is said to have as many as thousands. On the other hand, there are still controversies over the passage, passage, name, nature, achievements and limitations of Chinese modern literature, Some scholars have simply given up the concept of “new literature” and “modern literature” and put forward the narrative framework of “Republic Literature”. In contrast, overseas scholars do not have the impulse to write history as strong as the domestic academia, and literary history writing has been tepid. However, it is clear that these articles